News & Insights

New Mexico Supreme Court
  • Article

Q&A Lawyer Liability and Ethics: New Mexico Adopts Objective Standard for ER 8.2

by Joseph Brophy for the Maricopa Lawyer, a publication of the Maricopa County Bar Association
This month’s column discusses a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of New Mexico in an attorney disciplinary proceeding. Learn how that ruling highlighted a split in authority over the standard for determining whether a lawyer’s statements about a judge’s qualifications or integrity are sanctionable.
  • Article

Q&A Lawyer Liability and Ethics: Prosecutors Do Not Have Higher Ethical Standards for Personal Conduct

by Joseph Brophy for the Maricopa Lawyer, a publication of the Maricopa County Bar Association
Last month this column discussed a disciplinary proceeding before the Supreme Court of Kansas arising out of a parking lot accident between a golf cart driven by Lawyer and an unoccupied pickup truck. Learn what happened when the matter found its way to the Kansas State Bar’s Office of Disciplinary Administrator.
  • Article

The New King of the Entertainment Industry? The Unlikely Story of Video Games and the First Amendment

by Ryan M. Walters for the Ohio State Technology Law Journal (Fall 2022, Vol. 19, Issue 1)
From their humble origins in the 1950s, video games have aggressively grown both commercially and artistically as a medium. Even the industry’s critics cannot ignore that its global gross revenue in 2021 exceeded the combined totals of the film and recorded music industries. In spite of the massive external economic benefits this industry generates, many vocal opponents still remain to the U.S. Supreme Court decision extending video games unqualified First Amendment protection, Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 564 U.S. 786 (2011).
  • Article

Q&A Lawyer Liability and Ethics: Court Declines to Impose Reciprocal Discipline

by Joseph Brophy for the Maricopa Lawyer, a publication of the Maricopa County Bar Association
A recent case out of the Virgin Islands provides a rare example of one court refusing to summarily impose reciprocal discipline on a lawyer because the disciplining court did not afford the lawyer sufficient due process. This month’s column discusses this interesting case and its outcome.
JKW Law

Phoenix

602.234.7800
2800 North Central Ave. Ste. 1800
Phoenix, AZ 85004

Albuquerque

505.346.4646
201 Third Street NW Ste. 1200
Albuquerque, NM 87102

Tucson

520.790.5828
5210 East Williams Cir., Ste 800
Tucson, AZ 85711

Copyright © 2025 Jennings Haug Keleher McLeod Waterfall Law Firm All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Legal Notices | Privacy Policy | Corporate Transparency Act

Start typing and press enter to search